Have your say on the spendings in Chippendale. Email City of Sydney before June 13th.
May20th 2025:
Here is a copy of the newsletter highlighting our comments on the revised proposal and vision for Chippendale, send to all of our friends.
May14th 2025:
The developers have made several amendments to the original DA, here is a summary of our response to City of Sydney.
Unfortunately, the underlying pattern of minimal investment and disregard for existing regulations and residents persists. The proposal still fails to meet the standards of sustainable design or responsible construction and remains more harmful than beneficial to the area. While minor improvements are welcome and have been suggested, the core issues—including environmental, regulatory non-compliance and disproportionate negative local impacts—remain. Friends of Chippendale conducted a detailed review, identifying multiple issues that still persist and offering practical solutions to reduce the project’s harm.
Beyond this, the project misses an opportunity lead by example, make itself future-proof and be a truly green and aspirational building. Something it can do whilst saving on running costs and improving the area.
The main points of contentions are:
Sustainability: No wastewater management, no on-site recycling, no guarantee green electricity will be used.
Traffic & Safety Risks: Eliminates Broadway access, rerouting all vehicles through narrow residential streets, breaching SEPP and DCP clauses.
Overdevelopment: FSR increase from 3:1 to 3.78:1 exceeds planning limits by 26% without infrastructure upgrades.
Non-Compliant Design: Minimal changes provided. Guest rooms and facilities breach City of Sydney minimum standards for storage, sanitation, and communal space.
Ignored Community Input: Over 300 objections raised concerns unaddressed in revised plans; collaboration offers rejected by developer.
Misuse of Developer Contributions: Chippendale sees minimal return on its contributions; urgent call for traffic calming and local reinvestment with CoS.
We're still waiting for an answer to from the developers. We'd love to have our voice heard.
April 2nd 2025:
During our meeting, the community came together to identify positive, proactive ways to engage with key stakeholders. We're committed to collaboration, transparency, and practical solutions.
Reaching out to architects, planners, and engineers to highlight DA non-compliance with professional codes
Offering alternative, community-informed solutions that align with best practice
Reinforcing our commitment to open dialogue and working together on shared goals
Focus on traffic: exploring ways to improve local flow, reduce congestion, and prevent Knox Street from being used as a bypass to avoid main road delays
We are now focussing our efforts in addressing these concerns.
February 4th 2025
After consultation with the community and a huge research and editing effort, we submitted the community letter to council, with the following main points:
Lack of Sustainability Data: The proposal lacks energy and water data, failing to comply with ecologically sustainable development principles.
Community Opposition: Over 300 individual objections cite environmental, infrastructure, and social concerns.
Infrastructure Strain: Increased congestion, waste, and resource consumption with no public contributions.
Environmental Impact: Estimated 2.77M kg CO₂ annually and 38M+ liters of water usage.
Call to Action: We urge rejection and reassessment and require transparency, sustainability measures, and community involvement.
Inconsistent with main bodies codes of conduct and decision makers: Planning, engineering and Architecture
We acknowledge the Gadigal people of the Eora nation as the Traditional Custodians of our local area.